The Republican voter ID charade

In Jake on March 19, 2012 at 2:26 pm

I have a sneaking suspicion that Tyler was trying to provoke me about voter ID this morning, and, well, it worked.

First, a rebuttal to the linked Jonah Goldberg op-ed. At its essence, his point is that people can’t get on airplanes, buy alcohol, or open bank accounts without photo ID. It shouldn’t be unreasonable, then, to ask them to produce ID when voting. Or I assume that’s the point he’s trying to make. He shrewdly disguises his logical and ideological shortcomings with hysterical red herrings about Democratic fear-mongering and race-baiting (this coming from the author a book entitled Liberal Fascism, no less…)

Goldberg’s first problem is his illogical conflation of the ability to engage in market activities with the ability to vote. The former is a private economic transaction. The latter is a Constitutional right underpinning our very form of government. The fact that Avis can deny me a rental car because I don’t have a driver’s license doesn’t, as Goldberg thinks, mean poll watchers should be able to deny my right to vote based on the same.

His second problem is an ideological one. Republican dogma holds that an inevitable trade-off exists between the size of government and individual liberty: the government that governs best governs least and so on. Yet, by Goldberg’s own admission, there is scant evidence of voter fraud taking place, pointing to — as AG Eric Holder called it — “a solution for a problem that doesn’t exist.” Still, Republican legislatures and governors across the country are charging forward with voter ID mandates. If more laws inherently mean less freedom, are Republicans tacitly admitting that they are restricting the liberty of some? Specifically, the “very old, very young, very poor, minorities, [and] the disabled” — the groups Goldberg correctly identifies as the least likely to have proper identification.

In theory, voter identification is not an unreasonable expectation. The sanctity of our democracy depends on the legitimacy of its electoral process, and we should take every step to protect it from fraud and corruption. Such theory assumes, however, a reality in which every eligible voter has equal, uninhibited access to a photo ID. That is simply not the case. Studies have shown that up to 11 percent of eligible voters do not have a qualified ID.

The problem isn’t the requirement itself, but the sequence. Instead of starting with the mandate, we should begin by expanding access to photo identification. After the 11 percent have obtained the necessary cards, they can be asked to present them when voting. (And Goldberg is right that many people are excluded from the modern economy due to lack of ID, so creating clearer pathways to government-issued cards can be justified in its own right.)

I anticipate, however, that this compromise wouldn’t go over well with Republicans. Regardless of what Al Sharpton says, Republicans aren’t pushing voter ID because they don’t like minorities — they want it because they don’t like people who vote for Democrats. It is a hardball political maneuver designed to gain an electoral advantage. And Democrats wouldn’t be opposed to people showing ID when they go to the polls if it wasn’t primarily their voters who would be disadvantaged.

I’m shocked, shocked to find that politics is going on in here!

  1. Is it really a charade? The party of handouts opposes the identification requirement for obvious reasons and the Republicans recognize that particular demographic i.e. illegal aliens, felons, slackers, and entitlement-worshiping minorities, as an impossible constituency to win over to the right side. Nevertheless, the idea of having identification verification as a requirement would enhance the integrity of process–much to the dismay of the Democrats.

    Bad laws and over-regulation mean less freedom. However,voter ID is a reasonable step that prevents your vote as well as mine from being watered down. The dead shouldn’t be casting votes along with other ineligible groups. I have no love for politicians and we both know that if the shoe was on the other foot, Republicans would be fighting against voter ID as well.

    I believe that those lacking an I.D. also lack essential values and probably shouldn’t be participating in the political process. If their voice and vote is important to them, then they’d go to trouble to obtain one.

    I liked your post. I can’t bring myself to agree with you, but I’m glad you took the time write about this issue. Sometime I want to get around to reading Goldberg’s book.

    • Thanks for the comment. I called voter ID a charade because the Republicans are disguising their political tactics as policy, but I agree that the Democrats wouldn’t be above it if the tables were turned. As I said in the post, I believe that a voter verification requirement is entirely reasonable, but that it should follow steps to expand ID access instead of preceding them. While I disagree with your characterization of those lacking ID, I’m glad that we can find some common ground when dissecting this issue. Hope you continue to read the blog.

  2. Reblogged this on DoubleyooTeeEff and commented:
    Here’s a very good take on the controversy about voter ID requirements. The call to expand access to photo identification for those who don’t have it is on point. Problem solved, win-win…right, right?

  3. […] enough, Gov. Tom Corbett of Pennsylvania has stepped in it again. No sooner had I reblogged a piece about voter ID laws (via Blog of Rivals) when this popped up. I’ll let Rachel Maddow explain it all for ya, […]

  4. […] Jake is right about a few things in his post. […]

  5. […] the mean time, you can get left’s interpretation here. Share this:FacebookRedditEmailStumbleUponPrintTwitterDiggLike this:LikeBe the first to like this […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: